Talent Search Partners, Inc.

TALENT SEARCH PARTNERS, INC.

Inspiration

Mutually Beneficial Persuasion

Real selling isn’t aggressive… It doesn’t manipulate and it’s not desperate… To be effective and to foster healthy relationships, stop selling the way you’ve been taught, immediately! In fact, let’s not call it selling anymore. There’s too much negative thought associated with that word… Instead of sales or selling, what if we coined it, “Mutually Beneficial Persuasion”… Let’s explore this… The primary grievance about traditional selling is its focus on being quantitative, and not qualitative… “Selling is a numbers game!” – how many have been fed this lie? Stop speed dating! Stop selling! You’re dialing to meet quotas, and there’s no life in what you’re saying… Those you speak to know that it’s not about them. Your interests are entirely self-serving… So, what is mutually beneficial persuasion? Simply, it’s about putting others first… Where does the “mutually” come into play? By putting others first, you’re making it mutual… You are a supply chain for others… When you make it about you, your pipe immediately clogs up, and you end up with nothing to give… Selling is a distributive act. Modern day thought has made it about receiving… I recently had a meeting with some company executives that I’m looking to work with… I did not leave with a signed agreement, but the meeting was a success… I concluded for them that they did not need me (i.e., a Search Partner) to fill their position… I sat across from decision makers whom I traveled to meet with at their office only to tell them that the best use of their time & money was not to use me… They are well governed with strong cashflow, but they’re at the infancy stage of their growth trajectory. They don’t need a Search Partner; they need an advisor; an ally. Someone to tell them the truth. Real selling is about becoming whatever they need you to be in the moment… The reaction from the President was interesting to say the least, but I left feeling like I did something good for the company. We ended up talking for close to 90 minutes about their business, their marketplace, and their steps towards future growth… We shook hands, exchanged holiday greetings, and I went back home to take my kids skating… No contract, no position to fill, just an exchange of value that had nothing to do with me and what was seemingly best for my business… A real “pipeline” is a distributor. It flows freely to others… The faucet in your sink is a producer; a one way channel of value to a thirsty person… A faucet is not installed for what you can do for it. It’s sole purpose is to serve… This is mutually beneficial persuasion. More to come on this…

Mutually Beneficial Persuasion Read More »

Clarity

Good leadership makes you feel safe by providing clarity, and confusion is an enemy to progression… Through no osmosis, I’ve identified the type of leader I don’t want to be, which is indirectly shaping the leader that I am becoming… My obsession with the topic of leadership was formed through my own personal experiences with it… Personally, my Wife is factual, and data driven. I am feelings/emotions driven… Admittedly, I’ve experienced the dangers of relying too much on emotions… This explains my affinity to emotional leaders over the years. There was common ground between us, and I felt safe around them… Interestingly enough, the leaders that I experienced the most difficulty with throughout my earlier years were deeply analytical & factual. How I treat people and the experience I endeavour to provide is the engine behind my approach to leadership… Self-awareness is the first step in this process… People follow you when you are clear of who you are, what you want, and where you desire to be… Any hint of ambiguity will compromise your position as a leader… Self-awareness allows good leaders to lead with clarity, and clarity builds a tent of safety around their followers… It’s an intentional and strategic process of self-discovery that only the courageous embark on… This is why feedback is necessary from those around us since we’re fundamentally blind to our own shortcomings… Those who solicit feedback from others and make the required adjustments become our best leaders and create environments that are safe for their followers. Over my 15 years as a Search Partner, I’ve had countless conversations with leaders from all walks of life. Through this journey, I’ve concluded that leadership and recruitment are interconnected. They’re so closely tied to each other that when one is in a delinquent state, it negatively impacts the other. Recruitment provides the people who are then coached, mentored, and directed by leaders. In light of this, I’m deeply invested in the development of our leaders to make sure that I am truly doing people a good service… Recruiters who have reduced themselves to just ‘resume pushers’ have diminished their own value in the marketplace… Let’s grow your business, together.

Clarity Read More »

Forget Ethics, We’re Hurting The Marketplace By Not Giving People Feedback

Ghosting was the unofficial theme for 2025… We can all agree that no one deserves to be left in the dark… Human decency dictates that everyone is worthy of being told how an interview or meeting went… This new anti-ghosting legislation coming into effect in 2026 is being received with some pessimism, with some believing that it will offer no real value to someone who could use such feedback from an employer as a catalyst for self-reflection & self-improvement… To fulfill his mandatory media obligations and avoid fines, Marshawn Lynch aka “Beast Mode” of the Seattle Seahawks took part in a memorable media day press conference in 2015. He was quoted as repeatedly saying – “I’m here so I won’t get fined” … “I’m here so I won’t get fined” … “I’m here so I won’t get fined”… Check out the official clip here – https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tF7nQibuWjA I’m afraid that many decision makers will only comply with this new law just so they won’t get fined, meeting base standards with the absolute least amount of effort… Cue the rise of automated (generic) responses that job seekers can expect to receive as a result of this new bill – “After careful consideration…” My major concern however is how such feedback will negatively impact our quality of talent, unemployment, and productivity within the work environment. Anyone who has ever written a persuasive essay in grade school is familiar with their professor’s infamous red pen… Those who struggled with persuasive writing are quite accustomed to seeing their papers returned covered in red ink… While disheartening, your professor’s red pen was a sign of mercy and redemption… You were usually given a chance to review the comments with your professor, make the necessary corrections, and re-submit your paper. The process could take 2 or 3 revisions, but in the end, you usually ended up with a better grade had you not taken those steps… This process of self-editing based on constructive qualitative feedback produced a better grade & student in the end… Let’s not forget the importance of feedback that allows someone to make the necessary adjustments and how that can positively impact their future… By not providing job seekers with this sort of information, we are allowing them to proceed through the marketplace at a disadvantage, thereby diminishing the quality of their interactions with companies, which will result in more widespread frustration from both sides… As a Search Partner with 15 years in the recruitment industry, I’ve had countless candidates ask for feedback after their interviews no matter how negative it was… They viewed feedback as a way of measuring their growth… So, if we are going to mandate that decision makers provide feedback to applicants as part of an anti-ghosting initiative, let’s double click to make sure that the feedback is specific, thoughtful, & honest… We owe it to our society to ensure that we are positioning our best for long-term success.

Forget Ethics, We’re Hurting The Marketplace By Not Giving People Feedback Read More »

I Gave Up Speed Dating To Scale My Business

For those who are familiar with speed dating or old enough to remember it during its rise, think of a pressurized room filled with enthusiastic single people searching for companionship under strict time constraints. As you move from table to table, person to person, you quickly begin to realize what works for you and what doesn’t. Those conversations, while brief, can convey a lot about you to the other person and vice versa. There’s hardly enough time to form an organic connection with someone, but many turn to it to increase their odds of ending the year in a relationship… It’s timed due to the number of attendees with the purpose being to give everyone a chance to make an introduction. If a connection is made, you can opt to pull out with that person or you can proceed to the next table. The time constraint can be a friendly ally to someone who is completely disinterested or uncomfortable with the person they’re seated with… This year marked my 15th year in recruitment, and like many, I was introduced to it in the conventional transactional manner. Need a body? Here you go! Send the cheque! There was no time to build a real partnership with a company because it was on to the next decision maker with a need, and you kept doing that until you felt completely burnt out at the end of the day… Many prefer this approach because it gives them an easy exit if feelings about a search or company change, or it’s looking like your effort is not going to materialize into a placement… Granted, it’s a thrill at times to engage in these scavenger hunt activities to fill a position, racing to beat your competition and collect a fee payout. Many have done quite well under this model… The pivot for me came once I realized the value and importance of time. I was still newly married, and my second child was here. My Wife was the primary caregiver to our kids, and I vowed to take care of them… …something had to change. Personally, working in this way contradicted the very essence of who I am as a human being. I’ll take one meaningful relationship over 5 or 6 open-ended connections with no real value add for either side. I was speed dating my way through the industry. I was having conversations with a lot of people, but hardly establishing anything that was sustainable with repeatable business, and lasting value. I was waiting for that bell to ring or that cheque to clear, and on to the next. What’s interesting is that I tried to convince myself that I wasn’t transactional, yet my fruit declared differently. I operated unethically, not because I was unethical, but because of the pressure I was under to produce. You pounced all over a client request because you never knew if or when the next one would come knocking. The rollercoaster of emotions coupled with financial unpredictability forced me to double click on what I wanted from a career in recruitment, and how I wanted to be remembered. Did I want to be just another guy at a table in a crowded room, or a strategic partner with a permanent seat at the table? There’s a difference. Cue the transformation to what has now become a search boutique predicated on delivering tangible results (not just lip-service) to people. We’re still driven by numbers to remain in business, but we don’t treat people like numbers… If you’re at a similar place professionally, reach out to me directly. I would enjoy hearing your story… For the past 15 years, I’ve facilitated placements within engineering and technology, with a focus of late on improving outcomes for organizations through better leadership… There’s a better way to grow your business… …let’s explore this together.

I Gave Up Speed Dating To Scale My Business Read More »

A Slap On The Wrist (New Anti-Ghosting Legislation)

EMPLOYERS, you can now be fined it you do not provide feedback to a candidate you’ve interviewed within 45 days. This is new legislation as part of a reform to our employment standards in Ontario. This will come into effect January 2026…happy new year! Great news, right!? I wish I could rejoice with everyone in the marketplace… I guess strong-arming an employer to act ethically could be considered a win, but there’s still a lot of work to do… Fines are like placing a band-aid on a muscle ache. We’re simply covering the issue without really addressing the source of the problem… Does a candidate deserve to be informed about the outcome of their interview? Absolutely. Do I believe decision makers & candidates should be held accountable? Absolutely. I wish it were that simple to make ghosting disappear by throwing money at it, but it bothers me that such a fundamental act is not being practiced in the first place. We’ve concluded that financially penalizing the offenders will somehow improve the state of the marketplace and make our economy stronger. Those of us who have had to punish our children without addressing the error and conveying best practices going forward, know that it’s probable for that child to engage in the same actions in the near future. Penalties without outlining clear steps towards rehabilitation are short-lived… We’ve also seen examples of those with enough financial backing to circumvent penalties to protect their own interests. Sadly, this is nothing new. Every decision maker needs to ask themselves the following question: 👉 What is our vision statement for how we’d like to be perceived in our marketplace? A sober answer to this question will eradicate the possibility of ghosting anyone. Your competitive advantage is directly tied to the experience you provide to people, and one bad experience can derail your entire business model. Respecting people should be foundational, not a forced act by way of a penalty. Poor business etiquette has penetrated our leadership ranks. We’ve lost the art as leaders to communicate bad news to people, choosing to hide behind emails or not communicating at all. “Anything you can do, I can do better” has become a theme song for many who take part in the hiring process. Recruiters are ghosting candidates, candidates are ghosting recruiters, decision makers are ghosting recruiters & candidates, and so forth… Proving that I can “out ghost you” has become a thing, leaving casualties along the way and a fractured hiring process that will force our best and brightest to search for greener pastures in neighbouring economies. A poor reputation spreads like a wild fire, and fines are masking the real issue. Treating people well will cost you nothing – this is precisely why GOOD LEADERSHIP matters.

A Slap On The Wrist (New Anti-Ghosting Legislation) Read More »

LAYING PEOPLE OFF IS A COP OUT

Of all the expenses you could slash within an organization during financial instability, you chose the human! Firstly, if you think of your people as expenses, then you’re in the wrong business… When someone says that layoffs are a mandatory measure towards becoming leaner/stronger or represent a pivot into something new, what I really hear is someone who cannot be bothered to lead during a period of change… It’s more desirable to manage the integration of new technologies than it is to lead people, especially those who might be underperforming…(the true measure of leadership)… Similarly, tolerating a poor performer versus taking action to remedy the situation is just as bad… Have employees allowed themselves to become dispensable or are leaders responsible for creating widespread redundancy that they now condemn and are taking measures to get rid of? Have we consciously (or unconsciously) put people into positions that leverages a small fraction of their entire skill set, thereby leading to monotony, which leads to burnout, which leads to employer frustration, & ultimately mass layoffs… Cue the solution – robots… “We are simply embracing the future with hopes of competing” – says every modern day CEO… What we’re really fostering is a business world driven by fear and insecurity. Employees don’t trust their leadership to prioritize them during a downturn or change, and employers have strategically commoditized their people thereby making it easy to cut ties with them… Is the onus on employees to fight to remain relevant or is it on employers to lead with more compassion? Why can’t we have a balance? An equilibrium that promotes employee accountability and leaders who care!

LAYING PEOPLE OFF IS A COP OUT Read More »

You’re Never Alone As A Leader

Good leadership doesn’t always translate to a multitude of followers. In fact, there are times when you’ll stand alone… Well, not completely alone. Your convictions are right there beside you… Your decisions will not always please the majority, but compromising will keep you up at night in deep regret… I’d rather enjoy peaceful sleep… Strive to please everyone, while remaining conscious that you will never please everyone. Even on your best day, you’ll come up short… This revelation isn’t meant to discourage effort… In fact, it should motivate you to perform at your daily best… Good leadership does not take days off and it can never be persuaded to abandon its mission… It’s resilient and driven entirely by Love… That still small Voice is always right – a soft answer really does pacify anger… Try it.

You’re Never Alone As A Leader Read More »

She Impacted Lives Wearing An Apron

There are not many things that move me at this point in my life. My perspective on life and what’s important has gone through a major renovation… In the midst of all these different life experiences, the human remains foundational. I learned today that my late Grandmother fed members of my Mother’s Church after service every Sunday. She did this consistently, with zeal and love… As noble an act as feeding hungry people is, it’s how my grandmother would’ve made these people feel that compelled them to keep coming back that stands out to me (good food aside)… People matter, and how you treat them is more powerful then what you say. I couldn’t quite understand why I cried the day a co-worker disclosed that he was leaving the company. I had never cried for anyone prior, and I haven’t cried for anyone since… He was a good guy, but that wasn’t what moved me to tears… What triggered the emotions was a deep seeded sadness for how he had been treated that forced him to resign… It pained me to see another person leave that office because of a poor leader. Something happened to me that day… I realized that my tolerance for poor leadership was at its lowest point… What made matters worse was the lack of accountability and ownership of the problems… I’ll gladly stand shoulder-to-shoulder with a leader who has made a mistake, learned from it, and is taking the necessary steps towards improving… …he blamed everyone who left. Leadership is a responsibility that should not be taken for granted. When you treat people well, you never have to convince them to go the extra mile… The formula is simple – the more someone feels cared for, the more they do and the better they feel about what they’re doing.

She Impacted Lives Wearing An Apron Read More »

The GK Style of Leadership

He challenged me, and the experience changed the trajectory of my career in recruitment. He had 2 Master’s degrees, a Mathematician with a deeply analytical mind. Uniquely, he was also a tremendous people person with an uncanny ability to tear down barriers that most people put up. He asked thoughtful questions, while giving you his undivided attention. When he spoke to you, you felt like you were the only person who existed in the universe. He was one of the most life altering leaders I’ve served under, despite my best efforts to escape his influence. Hereinafter, referred to as GK. GK was a perfectionist & a problem solver by nature, who practiced what he preached. You talk about having compassion for people – he had it in abundance. Sadly, I was too immature to appreciate what stood before me. I thought he was out to get me. My conversations with him were intense – usually confrontational with him calling out my nonsense (almost daily). I avoided him at all costs, greeting him only when I had to, keeping everything surface level. I didn’t understand him, and I had no intention of changing that. Hindsight being 20/20, I now see that he was challenging me not to think like the average recruiter. He taught professionalism at the highest level, the importance of subject-matter competence, and treating people with respect. He believed that you could only be seen as credible in the profession if you understood the market/industry you worked in. His premise was that you cannot effectively recruit people who operate at their highest level in their field if you don’t understand what they do and how they do it. The used car salesman, ‘one-size-fits-all approach wasn’t going to cut it under his leadership. GK was loved by the frontline staff and was a thorn in upper managements side. Mainly because he held them accountable by calling out things that didn’t make sense. He wrestled with the CEO for pay raises for his staff, while holding those same people to unwavering excellence. He ate dinner at the office and was normally the last one out. A true professional if there ever was one. The turning point: My perspective of GK changed the day I was told that he renegotiated his salary (inversely) during a downturn in the company. He proposed cutting his salary directly in half to free up cash flow, which was of course agreed to by upper management. He switched to a part-time schedule going forward, but between you and me, his part-time productivity was equivalent to (maybe surpassed) the output levels of his full-time counterparts. Talk about putting your money where your mouth is, and checking your ego at the door. Leadership requires action, not generic statements or catchphrases. It’s about doing what you said you would do, and not compromising on that. Hypocrisy is one of the toughest pills to swallow for those you’re leading. Leadership is a responsibility, not a right. Lead with your heart, and you’ll never have to convince people to go the extra mile.

The GK Style of Leadership Read More »

The Great Separation – Why Organizational Leadership Finds Itself On The Unemployment Line

Never in my 15 years in recruitment have I ever seen more qualified people looking for work. By qualified, I refer to people who would ordinarily not find themselves unemployed in a traditional marketplace. The other variable is the length of time they find themselves in the market. Good people find jobs, and find them quickly. This has been the expectation for years, but not the case anymore. The market isn’t just candidate heavy, but it’s ‘top-tier’ candidate heavy, and this worries me. The caliber of talent that I am witnessing enter the market is mind-boggling and lends itself to deeper reasoning and investigation. The market has changed drastically over the past 5 years. We’ve lived through a global health pandemic that changed the landscape of how we perform our jobs. We learned quickly that we were capable of being just as productive working outside of the office – the ingenuity of the human race was in full display. This opened up an entirely new marketplace for organizations. They could now explore talent outside their geographic limitations, not to takeaway from the heightened level of safety we all felt as a result of working from the comfort of our homes. Working from home was not only more convenient, but it quickly became the norm, and some have never looked back. With everything in business, there’s always a trade-off. Companies were granted access to a wider and more diverse talent pool, but at what cost, and how has that impacted the future of work, employment, unemployment, and the next generation of workers? Did decision makers over-extend on hiring out of excitement or fear? Did they over-forecast or underestimate the work from home phenomena? Were execs so ‘hire-happy’ that they failed to properly plan for the future? Let’s explore 2 reasons for the rise of unemployment amongst senior leaders. Cost Cutting Due To Redundancy The surge in hiring during covid resulted in widespread redundancy within the workplace. We are currently going through a workplace refresh, with leaders facing tremendous pressure to bring people back into the office. This is hinged on the belief that too much influence has been given to workers. After all, employees now demand/expect to work remote or on a schedule that fits their needs. Many roles were also created during covid to provide the necessary leadership and technical coverage during a moment of great unpredictability – roles that under normal circumstances would not have been necessary. A “swing for the fences because we don’t know if we’ll live to see tomorrow” mentality was now prevalent in the workplace, and this caused a period of irrational behaviour amongst leaders. Consequently, we have an over-populated workplace with no chemistry. This disconnect, coupled with the hires of those with similar skill sets & competencies, has forced decision makers to trim their workforce, starting naturally with the highest paid. Only the 1% have weathered the storm. AI/Technology Has Made Key People Expendable This is a sensitive subject because AI has become integral to how we work and do business. The influx of senior talent entering the market in search of a new career is deeply concerning, but what role has AI/technology played in this shift? Companies are opting to retain their technical gurus with the latest software under their belt over the detached C-Suite professional, primarily because employees are smarter, self-sufficient, and self-managed. Technology after all needs to be managed by someone, and it definitely won’t be by the Director or VP who has little to no contact at the ground-level. The approach is now to automate where & what you can, and trim what is (who is) left. If you’re a Senior Leader in today’s workforce, it’s imperative to remain closely tied to the technical aspects that govern the organization. The days of leading a technical team without understanding what they do or being able to do it yourself are over. We expected hybrid as a type of work, but what we didn’t expect was a movement towards a new hybrid style of leadership – leaders who can teach and also do – this is the 1%. Your leadership style is great (who doesn’t love servant leaders), but tell me the last time you wrote (or understood) a clean piece of code? What are you doing to remain relevant technically? I’m concerned, but optimistic. Good people always land on their feet, and wherever they land it’s for certain that they will replicate past success & cultivate high performers and future leaders. Let’s Sum This Up For anyone who is thinking about changing careers or switching to a new company during a period of great instability such as a recession or another pandemic, make the transition with caution and qualify the legitimacy and future of the position in question. Ask probing questions to better understand the vision the organization has for the role. That new Chief Of Something may sound great on the surface, but is it a role designed to address an immediate leak or a position they believe will be intricately woven into the fabric of the company for years to come. Try these: These questions are circumstantial, but listen for the answers. The more you hear, the more secure you should feel one way or another. Every role should have at minimum a 5-year outlook, a vision of relevancy that extends beyond the short-term. This is especially true for a position that is being created or has not existed beyond the 5-year mark. For more content like this, please follow me here on LinkedIn.

The Great Separation – Why Organizational Leadership Finds Itself On The Unemployment Line Read More »